By Robert Romano
One can fault House Republicans for many things, but opposing an
extension of the payroll tax cut and another extension of unemployment
benefits is not one of them.
Whether one agrees with the issue or not, the fact is, the House has already passed extensions of both of these items. At a cost of $180 billion, those extensions would last for the duration of calendar year 2012.
Yet, to read the headlines, and to listen to the White House’s
talking points, House Republicans are intransigently opposed to the
plan, and just want to stick it to the “middle class” on Christmas. How
“Obama Says Payroll Tax Cut Blocked by 'Faction' in House,” blared
one headline. “House Republicans reject 2-month payroll tax cut,”
declared another. “House rejects payroll tax cut, jobless benefits,”
still another stated.
There’s only one problem. It’s just not true.
It’s a talking point. Not news. Not even remotely factual.
What is true is that the House and Senate have not yet agreed on the
details of that legislation. While the House has passed a 12-month
extension, the Senate has merely kicked the can down the road for 2
Usually when that happens, as anyone who has passed a basic lesson
on civics could tell you, there’s a conference committee, wherein the
House and Senate will work out their differences. Heck, it’s even in
After all, the House is under no more obligation to pass the Senate
version of the extension than the Senate is to pass the House version.
Which is why the framers envisioned a conference committee.
And, that is exactly what the House has voted for.
By a vote of 229 to 193, the House voted in the affirmative on a “Motion to Go to Conference”.
Not even on the Senate bill. It was declaring, in effect, that it has
already voted on this piece of legislation, and that both houses now
need to hash out their differences.
Get full story here.